A Tale of Two Apologies
Today, I want to take a moment to provide some analysis on recent public apologies that fall on opposing edges of the apology spectrum.
On the ‘waited too long’ end of the spectrum we have pro football player Michael Vick–nearly three months elapsed from the time that he was accused of illegal dog fighting until the time he actually issued an apology. And when he finally did apologize–virtually everyone saw it as too little too late. While he can recover, it scores low on the courage and integrity scale.
And on the ‘apologized too soon’ end of the spectrum we have Senator Larry Craig, who was in such a hurry to issue his apology that he apparently bypassed legal and crisis communications counsel, his chief of staff, and good sense in general, and rather than just apologize, he pled guilty.
Consider this: Senator Craig was so mortified of the charges being brought against him that he didn’t seek the advice of an attorney, crisis communications counsel, staff, family or friends. He went it alone to try and keep it quiet, acting as if this were the political environment of the early 1970’s, where members of Congress could count on a Las Vegas ‘what happens here, stays here’ approach to Congressional misdeeds. In accepting the plea for disorderly conduct, rather than fighting the charges levied against him, he also accepted responsibility, and guilt. And in doing this, he tied his own hands–when the charges were brought to light, claiming innocence was not a viable option. Had he met with legal and communications counsel–or anyone not overwhelmed by the moment–he would have been aware of that.
Adding to all of this is the oddity of Craig’s vehement public statement: ‘I am not gay. I have never been gay.‘ It’s like Craig was accused of fumbling in a football game and claimed, ‘I did not strike out.’ One has nothing to do with the other. Craig was being charged with inappropriately soliciting sex, not with explaining the nature of his sexual leanings. If a married man inappropriately pursues sex with a strange woman, upon finding out that she was a vice officer, would he suddenly claim, ‘But I’m not heterosexual!’
In Vick’s case, an apology should have been heartfelt and immediate. In Craig’s case, the Senator should have understood that the case against him was so subjective that loudly and vehemently denying any charges was the only way to save his legacy.
And the story continues. The NFL mulls over whether Vick should be allowed to ever play the sport again. Craig resigns, and the Republican Party breathes a sigh of relief, feeling that now they’ll have a better chance of preserving his seat in heavily Republican Idaho.
Hindsight is certainly 20/20, but perhaps these two situations help build the case for learning from others’ mistakes by seeking counsel– both legal and communications–prior to actually needing them. Make sure you have a legal and crisis communications team now, before you need it, and that trust amongst your team members is high. Looking for a the right crisis communications and legal team from outside of a bathroom stall or police station is likely not going to be the best time to get to this task.










September 6th, 2007 at 5:49 pm
I’m surprised mostly by Senator Craig and how a politically-minded person could audaciously think that pleading guilty would sweep the issue under the rug–especially if he wasn’t soliciting sex as he claims. Adding to this, Craig hired Michael Vick’s lawyer, Billy Martin, who didn’t seem to provide helpful counsel with respect to Vick’s apology and reputation management.
I guess there will always be a need for crisis communicators.
Michael Allison
http://www.michaelallison.ca